Super Turing Bowl I

World Football Trifecta League | The Mismeasure of Machines

[Scroll to the bottom for the latest results]

The World Football Trifecta League Year in Review reveals that Machines are no better than (Wo)Man at predicting football winners. In our league competition, only 67% of the three most probable winning picks as estimated by the fivethirtyeight.com ELO model proved correct in 2015-16 — barely higher than its total picks (65.2%). In addition, the Bing / Cortana model was 63% correct for the year overall, a rate of accuracy that corresponds to the average accuracy of our little league and the experts. Lastly, Madden 16 simulations at Bleacher Report finished with a 128-94 record – a questionable 57% (despite the self-congratulations).

When forced to select from the eight teams favored by our World Football Trifecta League Analysts, however, the ELO prediction model actually performed better (left table below). The ELO model favored Cardinals over Rams in Week 4 and Chiefs over Bears in Week 5 (right table below), both incorrect picks.  Picking Broncos (week 4) and Patriots (week 5) reduced the estimated probability of a winning trifecta in both weeks, but resulted in winning trifectas nonetheless. In other words, a little human bias improved the ELO model’s trifecta accuracy from 4 to 6 trifectas — plus 50%.

ELO Predicitons | Bias | No Bias
fivethirtyeight.com ELO Predictions with and without Bias

Apparently, any machine or optimization model can pick games as accurately as the average human (~63%) based on perceived strength or record. The real question is: which machine models a bias most like a human for its own profit? Ultimately, if the Machines hope to swindle The Odds Makers, they must do more than pick games as accurately as humans (63% of the time). The Machines must submit accurate picks with the appearance of human bias — or risk being identified and blacklisted by The Bookies.

To this end, the Clearinghouse has organized a Turing League and will stage the first-ever Super Turing Bowl as a test to determine which professional football prediction model performs most like biased Humans while maximizing its rewards!

The Entrants | Home Teams

The Clearinghouse has recruited six different pure-bred Machines and two Cyborgs to predict world professional football games in the playoffs per the Super Trifecta Bowl rules. Notably, the six Machines favored five different teams to become the NFL champion in 2015-2016 and the order of Home Team selection may have little influence on the outcome of Super Turing Bowl I.

The Machine Entrants are: ELO Machine, Bhanphuri Machine, Bing Machine, Harvard SA Machine, DVOA Machine, and Madden 16 Machine. To round out the competition to eight contestants, the Clearinghouse added CBS Pick Cyborg and Vegas Odds Cyborg to represent Cyborgs. The Cyborgs rely on Human inputs (picks or bets), hence the distinction as a machine-human hybrid.

The Machines selected Home Teams first and by random drawing. ELO Machine won the coin toss and selected the Panthers with the first selection. Selecting second, Bhanpuri Machine selected its favorite, the Bengals. Third, Bing Machine predicted the Patriots to repeat as NFL champions. Fourth, DVOA Machine favored the Panthers (already claimed), but was pleased to draw the Seahawks – its second most likely to win the Championship and its best team by DVOA at the end of the year. Selecting fifth, the Harvard SA Machine found their favored Cardinals still available. In sixth position, Madden 16 Machine sponsored its August championship prediction, the Steelers.

The Clearinghouse then assigned the CBS Pick Cyborg the best available team by seed (Broncos – AFC 1st seed – ostensibly its second choice), while the Vegas Odds Cyborg received the best available team by odds (Chiefs – the 7th best odds before the Wildcard Round is played).

As a control and yardstick for biased game predictions, Mike Ditka, who cursed counter-intuitively picked the Packers to win the world professional football championship back in September, is representing humankind. Though not a participant in the contest between Machines and Cyborgs, Ditka will pick three winners each week according to his biases and earn points based on the Turing  League’s Home Teams.

The Machines are not aware that Mike Ditka is a man — we presume. At the conclusion of the contest, Machine biases will be measured against the Manliness of Ditka.

The Entrants and Home Teams are:

Super Turing Bowl I | Slate of Machines
Machine Entrants for Super Turing Bowl I

The Pick Process | Weekly Trifecta Favorites

The Machines and Cyborgs have different methods for expressing their predictions. Bhanpuri Machine and Harvard SA Machine released tables indicating the probability of each team progressing in the playoffs to win the world professional football championship game. Weekly predictions will be based on a ratio of Hi-Lo probabilities for teams to move to the final round of the playoffs.

ELO Machine, DVOA Machine, Harvard SA Machine [revision], and Bing Machine (via Cortana) release weekly predictions based on the most recently available information. After its uncanny prediction last February, Madden 16 Machine apparently signed a contract with The Bleacher Report for its official simulations. The weekly predictions are utilized for these Machines.

The CBS Pick Cyborg will favor the teams with the highest register of fan support (by percentage) while the Vegas Odds Machine will pick the three teams with the largest spreads to cover (as of Friday).

Per the rules, the Machines and Cyborgs cannot pick against their Home Teams in any round. A routine, therefore, has to be set for selecting their Home Team and submitting three picks. A couple of Machines do not provide enough information to calculate a risk-rewards ratios for all trifecta points. As a result, Machine Picks will seek to maximize the likelihood of picking three winners by favoring their Home Team and championship prediction.

The Picks Routine is then:

1. If the Home Team is favored to win by any margin (probability or rating or spread), the Home Team is selected to maximize points.
2. If the Home Team is not favored to win in the Wildcard or Divisional Round, the Machine or Cyborg selects from the other contests.
3. Picks for the non-Home Teams are submitted in order of win probability in order to secure the base trifecta.
4. If a Home Team is eliminated, the Machine or Cyborg will change its bias to the most favorable Player Hater or Seeder Redux eligible team by prediction each week.

In other words, the Machines and Cyborgs will focus on picking three winning teams each week while adhering to the bias for its pro football championship predictions to become true. If the prediction fails, then the contestants will seek to maximize points with an un-owned or lower-seeded team regardless of win-loss prediction.

Picks | Wildcard Round

[Harvard SA Machine brought its interesting twitter account to our attention and we will rely on its weekly tweets for the strength of predictions. Summaries revised.]

Three Machines have Home Teams active in the Wildcard Round and Three Machines have teams on a bye week.

Bhanpuri Machine picks its Home Team Bengals to win, plus the Chiefs and Seahawks per ratios of Hi-Lo ratings. By odds of each team appearing in the Conference Championship games, DVOA Machine picks its Home Team, the Seahawks, plus the Chiefs and Redskins. At Bleacher Report, Madden 16 Machine reveals its favorites by projected score: Steelers (Home Team), Texans (the only Player Hater pick by a Machine), and Seahawks.

ELO Machine projects Chiefs, Bengals, and Seahawks as its most probable trifecta (19.8%). While the Patriots rest, Bing Machine selects the Chiefs, Seahawks, and Redskins as its most probable trifecta (22.6%) – consistent with its pre-playoff predictions. Lastly, Harvard SA Machine tweets its predictions for the Chiefs, Bengals, and Packers Seahawks [revision] have the better odds than their opponents to progress to the next round.

The CBS Picks Cyborg records the Seahawks, Chiefs, and Steelers as the most likely to move on from the Wildcard Round, while the Vegas Odds Cyborg suggests the Seahawks, Chiefs, and Steelers. Lastly, Mike Ditka attempts a rope-a-dope against the Machines and Cyborgs by favoring the Redskins over his pre-season favorite Packers. Since he can’t pick against the Packers, Mike Ditka submits the Texans, Steelers, and Seahawks in the Wildcard Round.

Picks | Super Turing Bowl I | Wildcard Round
Picks in the Wildcard Round of Super Turing Bowl I

Vegas Odds Cyborg and Madden 16 Machine make a play for the most points in the Wildcard Round of the Super Turing Bowl. ELO, Bing, and Harvard SA Machine form a consensus for the Chiefs, Bengals, and Seahawks.

Pick Results | Wildcard Round

Updated Sunday, January 10, 2016

Results | Super Turing Bowl I | Wildcard Round
Pick Results in the Wildcard Round of Super Turing Bowl I

A brutal week for the Machines in the Wildcard Round of the first Super Turing Bowl.

Bhanpuri Machine’s Bengals fumble in the Jungle, ending their predicted Championship run after only one game. The Bengals loss also ended the Wildcard trifecta dreams of ELO Machine and Harvard SA Machine. Bing Machine and DVOA Machine did not like that Mike Ditka’s Packers rediscovered a running game and offensive production, while Madden 16 Machine’s player hater upset by the Texans failed to materialize.

Madden 16 Machine’s Steelers and DVOA Machine’s Seahawks proved to be the winning bias for the Machines. The Cyborgs, however, dominated the Wildcard Round with the winning trifecta of Seahawks, Chiefs, and Steelers. Although a fiercely close and cold contest for the Cyborgs in Minnesota, a misguided field goal attempt in the final minute secured the winning trifecta for the Cyborgs.

Among humanity, Mike Ditka let his provincial Bears- and Cowboys-biases against the Packers get the best of him as he let a valuable trifecta slip through his fingers when the Texans laid an egg and the valiant Packers triumphed.

Standings | Wildcard Round

Updated Monday, January 11, 2016

The Vegas Odds Cyborg (14) and the CBS Pick Cyborg (10) spring out of the gates to take the lead in Super Turing Bowl I. Both Cyborgs earned the only base trifectas in the Wildcard Round. In third place, Madden 16 Machine (7) separates itself from the pack and equals the trifecta point production of the archetype of team bias in mankind, Mike Ditka.

In fourth place, DVOA Machine (5) capitalizes on its upset-minded team to gain one length over the rest of the competition. ELO Machine (4), Bhanpuri Machine (4), Bing Machine (4), and Harvard SA Machine (4) leave the gates at a ho-hum trot to contest fifth place.

Standings | Super Turing Bowl I | Wildcard Round
Standings after the Wildcard Round of the Super Turing Bowl I

Vegas Odds Cyborg made the most of its pole position, as the the Chiefs trump the rest of the field 30-0, and collects all 3 Reverse PC-Fecta points at stake in the Wildcard Round. DVOA Machine and Madden 16 Machine score the Playoff Victory points. Bhanpuri Machine, outwitted by Madden 16 Machine, sees its filly retired to the stables for the year.

Home Team Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Wildcard Round
Home Team Tiebreakers after the Wildcard Round of Super Turing Bowl I

Most Machines and Cyborgs wisely avoided the pursuit of Player Hater points in the Super Turing Bowl, but Seeder Redux points were ripe for the predictive harvest. Mike Ditka set a manly bar with picks for both #6 seeds (Seahawks and Steelers). The Cyborgs and the Madden 16 Machine skillfully followed suit with rewarding Picks for both #6 seeds.

DVOA Machine road its championship prediction (Seahawks), flanked by ELO Machine, Bing Machine and Harvard SA Machine. Bhanpuri Machine, which could not take the Steelers to win, also countered with a winning upset Pick with the six-seed Seahawks.

Common Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Wildcard Round
Common Tiebreakers after the Wildcard Round in Super Turing Bowl I

Preliminary Favorites | Divisional Round

Updated Tuesday, January 11, 2016

Picks have begun to come in from the Machines for the Divisional Round, but will not be finalized until Friday. Since the Machines and Mike Ditka are not subject to the bias of others, The Clearinghouse will post trifecta submissions as they are received.

Preliminary Picks | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Preliminary Favorites for the Divisional Round of Super Turing Bowl I

ELO Machine runs the numbers and submits its favorite, The Panthers, with Cardinals and Broncos to complete the trifecta. Bhanpuri Machine, confronted by the elimination of its Home Team, changes its allegiance to the highly-rated Steelers in its model and rounds out its pick three with the Cardinals and Panthers.

Bing Machine still likes the Patriots to win the world professional football championship game, but erred in its bracket predictions when the Steelers upset the Bengals. Unless new calculations show otherwise, Bing Machine adds the Panthers and Broncos for the trifecta.

DVOA Machine, after updating its odds, suspects the Panthers will beat its Home Team, Seahawks. In a Ditk-ish move to prove its intelligence, DVOA Machine submits Cardinals, Broncos, and Chiefs. Harvard SA Machine backs its championship prediction, the Cardinals, as well as the Patriots and Panthers.

[Madden 16 Machine is expected to release its simulation at Bleacher Report on Friday].

In early Cyborg activity, CBS Pick Cyborg leans toward its Broncos plus the Cardinals and Panthers. Vegas Odds Machine has low expectations for the Chiefs, its Home Team, to win in New England and plays the odds in order to hold onto its big lead by picking the Cardinals, Broncos, and Panthers.

No word from Mike Ditka at this time.

Overall, safe favroites for average-to-low Super Trifecta points by the Machines and Cyborgs. This week, however, there is more variance in the teams supported by the Machines. Bing Machine will be rooting for the Packers to break the pace of its competitors while Bhanpuri Machine and Harvard SA Machine look for an upset in Denver. DVOA Machine will be backing upsets in both New England and Carolina.

Picks | Divisional Round

Updated Friday, January 15, 2016

Machines, Cyborgs, and Mike Ditka have submitted their final Picks for the Divisional Round of Super Turing Bowl I. Notably, no two Machines favor the same three teams to win in the Divisional Round. One is bound to separate itself from the mechanical plebs with a winning bias! The Clearinghouse is a little disappointed to see the Cyborgs submit the same three picks a second time. It may not matter in any case — Mike Ditka seeks to punk the Machine-Cyborg threat with two aggressive upset picks in the Divisional Round!

Picks | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Picks for the Divisional Round of Super Turing Bowl I

With the variety in the Machines’ picks this week, The Clearinghouse gives each Machine and Cyborg a little space to explain its picks:

ELO Machine favors wins by the Cardinals, Broncos, and Panthers (its Home Team) this week. The Patriots-Chiefs game is nearly a push (51% | 49%), so it avoids the pitfalls of an evenly matched contest. Unfortunately, ELO shares its picks with the Cyborgs, so it will not make up much ground with the current leaders.

Bhanpuri Machine after seeing its championship favorite bounced in the first round pins its point hopes on the Steelers in the Divisional Round (per pick selection criterion #4). If the Steelers win, Bhanpuri will capitalize big as 6 Machines and Cyborgs favor the Broncos. Cardinals and Panthers round out its pick three.

Bing Machine endorses its championship prediction and lists the Patriots as one of the three most likely winners this week. With its bracket busted, however, Bing Machine picks the Cardinals and Broncos as the most likely teams to advance this week. (NOTE: This differs from the preliminary picks above based on the bracket predictions).

DVOA Machine estimates the Seahawks-Panthers game a push, 49.3% vs. 50.7% chance of winning, but leans in favor of the Panthers. Since DVOA Machine cannot pick against his Home Team Seahawks, it submits Cardinals, Broncos, and the upset-minded Chiefs in a unique play. Although a safe play for 7 points, if the Chiefs and Seahawks win, DVOA Machine will trump the other Machines and Cyborgs.

Harvard SA Machine goes all-in on its Home Team Cardinals. Avoiding the quarterback uncertainty in Denver, it adds local favorites, the Patriots, and the Panthers. Noteworthy, all of the Machines and Cyborgs pick its championed team, the Cardinals, to win and move onto Championship weekend. Perhaps the other Machines and Cyborgs have been baised by the Harvard reputation!

Madden 16 Machine simulates a dubious end for its preseason championship prediction, the Steelers, with an ugly loss. To avoid a complete collapse in Super Turing Bowl I, it hedges its bets with the Seahawks in a play for 5 Seeder Redux points. Madden 16 Machine also has the Patriots and Cardinals winning comfortably.

CBS Picks Cyborg and Vegas Odds Cyborg are bullish on the Broncos and  Cardinals. CBS Picks Cyborgs gives a slight edge to the Panthers over the Patriots as its third pick. Vegas Odds Cyborg leans toward Patriots as the more reliable pick, but it may not pick against its assigned Home Team, the Chiefs. With trepidation, Vegas Odds Cyborg backs the Panthers and a nominal -1.5 spread.

Mike Ditka looks to end the debate between Man, Machine, and Cyborg. First, he appeared to leak his picks to the Charlotte Observer earlier in the week: “Ditka’s picking the Panthers to beat Seattle and go on to the Super Bowl, where Rivera’s former coach believes Carolina will beat New England.” At ESPN, however, he submits the Chiefs as one of three upsets of the week! A dastardly human trick on the unsuspecting Machines and Cyborgs, to say the least.

In addition, Ditka again curses picks the Packers as favorites to win. If the Packers win, he will crush the Machine and Cyborg consensus favorites. If not, he will retire for the evening pleased to have thrown more fuel on the “curse” controversy! With the uncertainty in his Patriots and Chiefs selection, Ditka completes his pick three with the Panthers and the Steelers — an upset he picked last week because its his home town! If Ditka’s trifecta delivers, the Beau Ideal of Bias will be mothballing Machines and Cyborgs in the Championship Round of Super Turing Bowl I!

Pick Results | Divisional Round

Updated Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Pick Results | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Pick Results in the Divisional Round of Super Turing Bowl I

The Machines make a stand against the unpredictable picks of Mike Ditka!

ELO Machine, Bing Machine, and Harvard SA Machine correctly pick three winners to earn the first trifectas by the Machines. What looked like a safe play on higher seeded teams to start the weekend, these three Machines sponsored three finalists for the Championship Round and accurately picked three higher seeds to win the Divisional Round.

Bhanpuri Machine, DVOA Machine, and Madden 16 Machine each picked a judicious upset in the Divisional Round, but failed to convert on onside kick opportunities that may have sent their games into overtime.

The Cyborgs continue to dominate the competition with a second trifecta in two weeks. Vegas Odds Machine astutely avoided the emotional upset pick and secured a trifecta with the Home Teams of other Analysts. CBS Picks Cyborg capitalized on its assigned team, the #1 seed Broncos.

Mike Ditka went off the rails in the Divisional Round. Whether driven by home town bias (PIT) or the allure of a curse (GB), the Beau Ideal of Bias missed on two of three picks and failed to build a lead over several Machines before the Championship Round.

Standings | Divisional Round

Updated Tuesday, January 19, 2016

ELO Machine, Bing Machine, and Harvard SA Machine move into position to challenge the Cyborgs in the Championship leg of Super Turing Bowl I. Riding trifectas that included their championship predictions, the three Machines overtake Madden 16 Machine.

Bhanpuri Machine, DVOA Machine, and Madden 16 Machine erroneously played for an additional post-season upset. With their championship steeds eliminated, the three Machines are not able to overtake the Cyborgs in the final leg of Super Turing Bowl I. We shall see how well Machines play for respect in the upcoming weeks.

The Cyborgs pad their lead in the Divisional Round by favoring the higher seeds. CBS Picks Cyborg moves into a first place tie with Vegas Odds Machine after its Home Team bucks Madden 16 Machine’s favorite. The Championship round will determine if the mob (picks) or money (bets) proves to be the better bias in Super Turing Bowl I.

One has to wonder if Mike Ditka preferred to the lay the curse on the Packers rather than defeat both Machines and Cyborgs in a contest of prescience. Nonetheless, Ditka still has an outside chance to defeat the majority of the Machines if he plays his biases correctly in the final leg of Super Turing Bowl I.

Standings | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Standings after the Divisional Round of the Super Turing Bowl I

ELO Machine, by virtue of its Home Team’s offensive dominance, gains a Reverse PC-Fecta point to take a one length lead over the next closest Machine. CBS Picks Cyborg netted two Reverse PC-Fecta points to move into a tie with Vegas Odds Cyborg.

Heading into the final leg, ELO Machine, Bing Machine, and Harvard SA Machine will need to sweep the Reverse PC-Fecta points in order to catch the Cyborgs in the final leg.

Home Team Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Home Team Tiebreakers after the Divisional Round of Super Turing Bowl I

Player Hater points and Seeder Redux points were not for the taking in the Divisional Round. While Bhanpuri Machine, DVOA Machine, and Madden 16 Machine strategically favored on upset in the week, the games ended with futile onset kicks.

In the final week, the Patriots and Cardinals afford a single Seeder Redux point to close the race.

Common Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Divisional Round
Common Tiebreakers after the Divisional Round in Super Turing Bowl I

Picks | Conference Championship Round

Updated Saturday, January 23, 2016

With one exception, the Picks have been submitted for the Conference Championship Round of Super Turing Bowl I. Despite the options narrowing, the Machines split their favor in the Conference Championship. The Cyborgs anticipate the same winners, but the CBS Picks Cyborg must stick with its Home Team Broncos to win. Mike Ditka attempts to correct course this week and follows the Vegas Odds Cyborg’s picks!

Picks | Super Turing Bowl I | Conference Championship
Picks for the Conference Championships in Super Turing Bowl I

In order of likelihood of strength:

CBS Picks Cyborg: With 16 points in the first two rounds, CBS Picks Cyborg only needs a Broncos win to take the first Super Turing Bowl. Unfortunately, the Cyborg’s human inputs suggest its Home Team will lose. Will Home Team bias help CBS Picks Cyborg beat the odds?

Vegas Odds Cyborg: With 16 points, Vegas Odds Cyborg gains if the Patriots show it the money. The Cyborg still must pick the world professional football champion correctly to secure the trophy.

The Machines are largely playing for bragging rights among each other at this points since the Cyborgs built such a commanding lead.

ELO Machine: With 9 points total, ELO Machine can reach 16 points if its Home Team Panthers march to victory.

Bing Machine: With 8 points total, Bing Machine can reach 17 points if its Home Team Patriots upset the competition.

Harvard SA Machine: Also with 8 points, Harvard SA Machine, can reach 17 points if its Home Team Cardinals earn their first championship.

The other Machines have been eliminated from the Super Turing Bowl I, but one has a chance to outwit Mike Ditka.

If Mike Ditka sticks to his Charlotte Observer prediction, then he is going for 2 more points and 9 total.

Madden 16 Machine can reach 9 points this week with its picks for the #2 seeds.  If it then picks the champion correctly, it will beat the Beau Ideal of Bias.

Bhanpuri Machine and DVOA Machine are competing for last place.

 

Picks | Championship Game

Updated Sunday, February 7, 2016

ELO Machine and CBS Pick Cyborg, which was forced to take the Broncos in the Conference Championship, came out of the Conference Championships looking a lot like the lucky player to have a playoff bias. At this point in the competition, only DVOA Machine also picked the Broncos and Panthers for the Championship Game. The final picks are:

Picks | Super Turing Bowl I | Championship Game
Picks for the Championship Game in Super Turing Bowl I

After the 49-15 drubbing of the Cardinals, ELO Machine pretty much has the Reverse PCFectas locked up. But you never know, Broncos may win 50-14, and that is why we pick the games!

Final Results| Super Turing Bowl I

CBS Pick Cyborg, which once again was forced to take the Broncos because its first choice was already taken, wins Super Turing Bowl I!

Vegas Odds Cyborg, with the seventh best odds Chiefs, finishes second.

Among the machines, ELO wins the competition hands down with 15 Super Trifecta points. Several lengths behind, Bing Machine and Harvard SA Machine tie in a photo finish for second place (tie).

Madden 16 Machine edges out the rest of the competition for fourth place.

Cyborgs bests the Machines! There may yet be a future for Mankind in the Robot  future!

Trifecta Points

Standings | Super Turing Bowl I | Final Results
Final Results for Super Turing Bowl I

Tiebreakers

Home Team Tiebreakers | Home Team Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Final
Final Home Team Tiebreakers for Super Turing Bowl I
Common Tiebreakers | Super Turing Bowl I | Final
Final Common Tiebreakers for Super Turing Bowl I

 

*Reviewed and updated in November 2016.

Share This:

Year in Review: The Monkey, The Man, and The Machine

Season II Analyst Analytics

To end the year, Little Tuna (73%) and The Strategist (71%) finished the season with the highest Pick accuracy rates. Big Tuna (65%) was the only other Analyst to finish above the Average Pick Accuracy Rate of 64%.

The average trifecta accuracy rate of the Analysts was 25% for the year. Little Tuna (41%), The Strategist (35%), and The Bookie (29%) beat the average rate. In total, we have four Above-Average-Analysts-of-the-Year!

Season II Analyst Accuracy Rates
The Pick Accuracy of Analysts by Race in Season II

In the individual races, it is not all about accuracy. Kal Krome (60%) won the Fibonacci Stakes despite falling below the average accuracy rate for the race (65%). In the Seeders’ Cup, The Strategist had the better pick accuracy (75%) than Little Tuna (67%) and lost nonetheless. Congratulations to the race winners, Little Tuna (3), The Strategist (1), and Kal Krome (1).

What truly matters in football analysis, though, is how our Analysts compare to The Monkey, The Man, and The Machine!

The Monkey

Last year, The Clearinghouse introduced the notion that some of our Analysts may be less accurate than a monkey flinging its poo at the names of three teams each week. Those three teams would have a 50% chance of being correct, on average, and The Monkey could accurately pick a trifecta 12.5% of the time (50% times 50% times 50% equals 12.5%).

In a 17-week competition, the proverbial poo-flinging monkey is expected to pick 2.125 trifectas during the season – the true test of being smarter than a monkey. Six of eight Analysts provide evidence that humankind is more evolved than poo-flinging monkeys!

The Man

Another test for our Analysts’ expertise is the direct comparison with their colleagues who make picks each week (CBS) and in our sports nation (ESPN). At CBS and ESPN, the so-called NFL Expert Picks ranged in accuracy from 59% to 66% (CBS) and from 56% to 64% (ESPN). The ESPN Sports Nation favorite was accurate in 63% of its picks. Thus, our eight Analysts compare favorably to the tele-tubey experts and collectively beat the nation with a 64% accuracy rate.

In a true test of football acumen, however, there is one man in the nation who stands above all other men (and all tele-tubey NFL experts are men) – Mike Ditka. At ESPN, The Oracle of Ditka picked 153 games accurately for a rate of 60% – a lower accuracy rate than all but three of our mixed-gender WFTL Experts during the year!

The Machine

The Clearinghouse has offered the fivethirtyeight.com ELO predictions as a resource to our Analysts during the year. The risk, however, was that The Machine is more accurate than Man or Woman. So, we at the Clearinghouse, tracked ELO predictions for the Analyst of the Year Award – since winning picks and trifectas are the only consideration for the annual competition.

Each week, ELO suggested three teams with the highest probability of winning their respective games, and a trifecta, as seen below.

Best ELO Trifecta Preditions in Season II
Best ELO Trifecta Predictions in Season II

As the table above shows, ELO had a rough year, correctly picking 34 games (67%) and accurately predicting only 4 trifectas total (24%). The four trifectas were spread across the four races (one per race). ELO would not have won an individual race or the annual competition by picking the most likely winners. In Week 16, like many of our illustrious Analysts, ELO had zero correct picks.

Overall, with an average 47.8% trifecta probability rate, ELO expected to earn EIGHT trifectas during the year and earned only FOUR. How frustrating for The Machine Overlords!

Season II ELO Accuracy Rates
The Accuracy Rate of ELO Predictions by Race in Season II

The Ribbons

Without further ado:

For prognostications that proved more accurate than ELO predictions in both trifectas and picks, Little Tuna and The Strategist earn Blue-Rage-Against-The-Machine Ribbons! The Bookie earns a Yellow-Rage-Against-The-Machine Ribbon for predicting more trifectas than ELO!

Man might not defeat the Machines, but Woman will!

[Round of enthusiastic applause]

Honorable mention for Big Tuna, Wise Orangutan, and Kal Krome for representing Man as nearly the equal of Machine.

[Round of unenthusiastic and uncertain applause]

Five Analysts earn More-Powerful-than-The-Ditka Ribbons: Little Tuna, The Strategist, Big Tuna, The Bookie, and Wise Orangutan.

[A few lonely whistles and catcalls from the Analysts’ Balcony]

Finally, the Go-Buy-a-Monkey Ribbons go to…. Minds Blank and B-Reezy!

[Coughs and murmurs in the audience]

Oh, how the mighty Minds Blank has fallen!

[A gesture  from the Analysts’ Balcony]

World Football Trifecta Crown
The prestigious award held by the Analyst of the Year.

Share This:

Super Trifecta Bowl II | Slate of Games | Wildcard Round

Super Trifecta Bowl II | Slate of Games

With compliments to CBS Sports, the Slate of Games for Super Trifecta Bowl II are:

Super Trifecta Bowl II | SlateofGames | Wildcard Round
The Slate of Games for the Wildcard Round of Super Trifecta Bowl II

Analysts may pick from any of the four games, including the game without any Analyst Home Teams (Steelers vs. Bengals). Analysts with one of the top two seeds in each conference are free to pick any of the eight teams to win. Analysts with a team in the Wildcard round may not pick against their Home Team.

As a game of skill, we provide a few links for Analysts to prepare their prognostication research:

Team Stats
ELO Predictions (fivethirtyeight.com)
Colleagues (other experts)

Trifecta Points

A trifecta (pick three correctly) is worth 3 points in the Wildcard round for all Analysts.

Analysts whose Home Teams are playing in the Wildcard round will earn 1 Playoff Victory point if their Home Team wins (NOTE: Analysts do not have to pick their Home Team in the trifecta to earn the Playoff Victory point).

Analyst who correctly pick Home Teams that are playing in the Wildcard round may earn Reverse PCFecta points: 2 for the best defensive effort (lowest score by an opponent) and 1 for the best offensive effort (highest score by the Home Team).

In the Wildcard Round, 1 Player Hater point can be earned for correctly picking the Texans to beat The Strategist’s Chiefs or the yet-to-be-renamed-Washington team to beat Minds Blank’s Packers.

The following teams earn Seeder Redux points with a win: Steelers (3 points), Chiefs (1 point), Seahawks (3 points), and Packers (1 point).

NOTE: Points earned from picks will vary by Analyst. For example, If Wise Orangutan correctly picks the Seahawks to win, he earns 3 Seeder Redux points (3 total). If Kal Krome correctly picks the Seahawks to win, he earns 3 Seeder Redux points, 1 Playoff Victory point, and up to 3 Reverse PCFecta points (7 total possible). If Kal Krome does not include the Seahawks in his trifecta picks, a victory by the Seahawks will yield only the Playoff Victory point (1 total).

Strategery

As we – the Clearinghouse and The Bookie – have invested money, time, and thought in our research to devise the best possible test of predictive skill, we must point out several considerations for the new point system:

1) Points in the early rounds are integral. If a Home Team is eliminated in the Wildcard or Divisional round, the Analyst will not be able to earn Playoff Victory or Reverse PCFecta points in later rounds. And, the base trifecta points for picking three correctly goes down each week.
2) Head-to-head competitions will make or break the Analysts strategy. Kal Krome or B-Reezy will be on thin ice for the rest of the competition depending on which Home Team loses this week.
3) If an Analyst’s Home Team falters, be a proud player hater. Most of the un-owned teams are low seeds and yield Player Hater points plus Seeder Redux points with each correct pick to win.

In other words, it is not the Horse the Analyst rides in, but the Horse the Analyst rides out that may win the Trophy!

Upset Probabilities

Each year, ten playoff games precede the professional football championship game held in February: four wildcard, four divisional, and two championship games.

In the first year of the World Football Trifecta League, only 2 away teams upset their hosts (20%) – the lowest upset rate of the past 13 years. The Ravens upset the Steelers in the Wildcard round and the Colts upset the Broncos in the Divisional round. Three away teams lost close games on questionable officiating calls: Lions to Cowboys (flag|no flag), Cowboys to Packers (catch|no catch), and Ravens to Patriots (legal formation|illegal formation). In the Championship round, the Packers gave away the NFC Championship to the Seahawks with an onside recovery. It could have been 6 away team wins just as easily as it was 2.

Since 2002, away team upsets have averaged about 3-4 per year (38%). In 2005 and 2010, 6 away teams (60%) upset the higher-seeded hosts – the highest recorded number of away team upsets in the past 13 years. Although home-field gives an advantage for the win, away teams will typically present 3 to 4 opportunities for Seeder Redux or Player Hater points in the playoffs — provided the Analyst picks skillfully.

Upsets by Away Teams (Lower Seeds)
Upsets by Away Teams (Lower Seeds), 2002-2014

Share This:

Super Trifecta Bowl II | Home Teams

The Entrants (by The Bookie)

Ladies and Gentlemen welcome to the second running of the Super Trifecta Bowl. This grueling next three week playoff race will bring us to the final leg of the season and the winning of World Football Analyst Championship Trophy.

World Football Analyst Championship Trophy
The most coveted trophy in sports analytics.

OUT TO PASTURE:

B-Reezy’s BEARS threw too many Cutlers, The Strategist’s RAMS not wanting to ruin their 8/8 season lost their last game and Orangutan’s JETS (who are the Jets?) have all been put out to pasture.

RIDERS UP:

B-Reezy aboard the Purple Bublicious VIKINGS, The Strategist on the Noble but are they Reidy? CHIEFS, and Orangutan on the We Would Have Won But He Hit Me CARDINALS  join Minds Blank on Pukey PACKERS, Kal Krome on Sea Sick SEA HAWKS, Big Tuna on But I Didn’t Inhale BRONCOS, Little Tuna on Cheating A Hole PATRIOTS and The Bookie on Arrogant, Bumptious, Cocky PANTHERS.

AT THE GATE:

The gate number of the Analysts reflects placement in the Analyst of the Year II competition:

Super Trifecta Bowl II | Slate of Analysts
The Analysts and their Home Teams for Super Trifecta Bowl II

 

The Race Rules (by the Clearinghouse)

The revised and complete rules for Super Trifecta Bowl II may be found here.

In short form, the Analysts need only know four things:

1) A correct trifecta (3 picks) earns 3 points in the Wildcard round, 2 points in the Division round, and 1 point in the Championship round.
2) Super Trifecta Points are awarded for a Correct Pick regardless of earning the trifecta.
3) Each time their Home Team wins an Analyst earns Playoff Victory points. If the Analyst correctly picks his or her Home Team, Reverse PCFecta points also may be earned in the round.
4) Correctly picking un-owned teams earn Player Hater points and correctly picking lower seeded teams earn Seeder Redux points in each round.

Share This:

Standings | Analyst of the Year II | Final Results

Analyst of the Year II

A nail-biter to the end!

In the final week of the Annual competition, two Analysts remained in contention for the coveted Horse’s Anal(yst) of the Year Trophy and purse.

Pulling a rope-a-dope, Little Tuna wisely chose not to pick her Home Team Patriots to win in Miami. Nevertheless, she saw her lead diminish to the narrowest of margins in the final moments of the season as the Seahawks put a first-half beat down on her tricky pick, the Cardinals, ending her hopes for a decisive trifecta victory.

Scrappy to the last moments of the season, The Strategist exploited the Little Tuna’s error and tried to ride her Rams to victory. Greg the Leg lined up for the game-winning field goal that would have sent the Analyst of the Year Award into a playoff… and missed! The Rams’ opponent then countered with a game-winning field goal.

In a photo finish, the Analyst of the Year Award goes to…. Little Tuna!

With seven trifectas and 37 correct picks, Little Tuna moves from worst to first from Season I to Season II and proves her mettle in this game of skill!

The remaining Analysts finished in:

2nd place | The Strategist  | 6 trifectas and 36 correct picks
3rd place | The Bookie | 5 trifectas and 32 correct picks
4th place | Big Tuna | 4 trifectas and 33 correct picks
5th place | Wise Orangutan  | 4 trifectas and 32 correct picks
6th place | Kal Krome | 4 trifectas and 30 correct picks
7th place – Tie | B-Reezy | 2 trifectas and 30 correct picks
7th place – Tie | Minds Blank | 2 trifectas and 30 correct picks

Trifectas

Standings | Analyst of the Year II | Final Results
Standings after the Final Week of the Analyst of the Year, 2015-16

Tiebreakers

Correct Picks | Analyst of the Year II | Final Results
Picks Tiebreaker after the Final Week of the Analyst of the Year, 2015-16

 

Share This:

Standings | Seeders Cup II | Final Results

Seeders’ Cup, 2015-16

Final Standings

A grueling finish to the 2015-16 regular racing season as the Analysts fail to earn one trifecta in the final two legs of the Seeders’ Cup. Nobody was able to close the distance with the early leader and the winner is….

Little Tuna! On the strength of her early picks, Little Tuna wins the Cup with 11 points. In second place, after an unprecedented four trifecta winning streak that began in the Fibonacci Stakes, Kal Krome finishes second with 6 points.

The Bookie takes 3rd place after bearing down (and then downed by the Bears) to end with 5 points. In fourth place with 3 points, The Strategist experienced the agony of defeat after a missed field goal in overtime. Wise Orangutan ends in 5th place, knowing what it truly is like to be a Jets fan.

Minds Blank, Big Tuna, and B-Reezy taking a beating in the final month of the season. Based on tiebreakers, they finish 6th, 7th, and 8th, respectively.

Trifecta Points

Standings | Seeders' Cup II | Final Results
Final Standings in the 2015-16 Seeders’ Cup

Tiebreakers

Tiebreakers | Seeders' Cup II | Final Results
Tiebreakers after the Final Leg of the 2015-16 Seeders’ Cup

Share This:

Picks | Seeders’ Cup 2015 | Leg 4

The Picks:

The Bookie: Panthers/Broncos/Bears
The Big Tuna: Broncos/Panthers/Patriots
The Little Tuna: Panthers/Cardinals/Broncos
Wise Orangutang: Jets/Broncos/Cardinals
The Strategist: Rams/Broncos/Panthers
Kal Krome: Panthers/Patriots/Packers
Minds Blank: Packers/Patriots/Broncos
B-Reezy: Broncos/Patriots/Cardinals

The Results:

The Bookie: Panthers/Broncos/Bears
The Big Tuna: Broncos/Panthers/Patriots
The Little Tuna: Panthers/Cardinals/Broncos
Wise Orangutang: Jets/Broncos/Cardinals
The Strategist: Rams/Broncos/Panthers
Kal Krome: Panthers/Patriots/Packers
Minds Blank: Packers/Patriots/Broncos
B-Reezy: Broncos/Patriots/Cardinals

Notes:

Panthers clinched home-field advantage (4 points).

Broncos clinched home-field advantage (4 points).

Vikings clinched division title (2 points).

 

Share This:

Scenarios | Seeders Cup II (2015-16) | Leg 4

Seeders Cup Leg 4 Scenarios:

For the final leg of the Seeders Cup, all eight Analysts remain in contention. First, here are the potential seeder points for the week with a team win:

Panthers = 4 points with a win.
Cardinals = 4 points with a win and Panthers loss.
Packers or Vikings = 2 points with a win (they play each other).

Patriots = 4 points with a win.
Broncos = 3 points with a win.
Broncos = 4 points with a win and Patriots loss.
Jets = 1 point with a win.

So, 11 seeder points (12 total) can be earned with a winning trifecta if the Broncos, Patriots, and Panthers or Cardinals win. Therefore, all Analysts are technically in the race before the picks (and box outs).

In order of strength, the scenarios are:

1a. Little Tuna wins if nobody picks correctly. With a 5 point lead on the closest contender, LT needs 7 trifecta points to win outright and 6 trifecta points to force a tiebreaker with the next closet Analyst provided the Pats win. Target seeder points = 6.

1b. If the Patriots lose and Little Tuna does not earn any more points (11 total), these Analysts can win a tiebreaker over Little Tuna provided they correctly pick their Home Team to win: Kal Krome, Strategist, Bookie, and Minds Blank.

2. Kal Krome (6 trifecta points) has a chance to come from behind to win outright. If Little Tuna falters, Kal only needs 6 trifecta points to overtake LT and 5 to tie. To be certain to stay ahead the next closest contender (The Bookie – 5 points), Kal will need 12 trifecta points. Target seeder points = 5 to 11.

3. The Bookie in third place only needs 7 trifecta points to beat LT and 6 total to tie LT if she fails to gain a trifecta in the final leg. To be sure to stay ahead of the next closest contender (The Strategist – 3 points), The Bookie needs 11 trifecta points. Target seeder points = 6 to 10.

4. The Strategist needs 9 points to take the lead if the three leaders fail to earn points and 8 points to tie Little Tuna. Wise Orangutan trails with 2 points, so Strategist would need 12 points to ensure she stays ahead of the orange one. Target seeder points = 8 to 11.

5. If the four leaders falter, Wise Orangutan needs 9 points to tie Little Tuna and win the race due to the first tiebreaker (Jets beat Pats!) regardless if the Pats win this week.  To stay ahead of the final three Analysts, Wise Orangutan needs a minimum of 11 points. Target seeder points = 8 to 10.

6a. Minds Blank has an option to go for 11 points with her Home Team to tie Little Tuna (provided LT does not earn a trifecta). If the Pats win and Packers win, Minds Blank will tie Little Tuna in trifecta points and Correct Home Team Selections. The Seeders Cup will come down to the Seeder Points earned by the Analysts. If the Pats lose, Blank wins on Home Team Selections. Target seeder points = 10 points.

6b. Minds Blank, Big Tuna, and B-Reezy need 12 points to win the Seeders’ Cup outright if all other Analysts fail to earn points. In order to make 12 points, these three Analysts need the Patriots to win (4), the Broncos to win (3), and then need to pick correctly between the Panthers or Cardinals (4 points) for the NFC home field advantage. Target seeder points = 11 points.

Example: Wise Orangutan only wants to tie Little Tuna and hope that others fail to earn points. He selects Jets (1 seeder), Broncos (3 seeders), and Patriots (4 seeder points). If the three teams win, he gets 1 + 3 + 4 seeder points and 1 point for the trifecta for a total of 9 points. With 9 points in the final Leg, he ties Little Tuna with 11 points total and wins the Seeders Cup due to the Head-to-Head tiebreaker (did I mention that the Jets beat the Pats!).

Share This:

Standings | Analyst of the Year II | Week 16

Analyst of the Year II

In the worst week in World Football Trifecta League history, four of eight Analysts fail to get one correct pick in the week, including the current leader, Little Tuna.

Nonetheless, Little Tuna’s two trifecta (7 trifectas, 35 picks) lead with one week to go eliminates The Bookie from contention in the annual competition. With two correct picks, however, The Strategist (6 trifectas, 34 picks) closes ground on the Little Tuna in week 16.

In the final week, Little Tuna wins the Analyst of the Year award with one more trifecta. If not, The Strategist has an opportunity to send the annual award into a playoff or to win outright should Little Tuna pick less than two correct winners.

Previously eliminated: Minds Blank, B-Reezy, Big Tuna, Kal Krome, and Wise Orangutan.

Trifectas

Standings | Analyst of the Year II | Week 16
Standings after Week 16 of the Analyst of the Year, 2015-16

Tiebreakers

Correct Picks | Analyst of the Year II | Week 16
Picks Tiebreaker after Week 16 of the Analyst of the Year, 2015-16

Share This:

Standings | Seeders Cup II | Leg 3

Seeders’ Cup, 2015-16

Standings after Leg 3

The horse senses of the Analysts stumble in the penultimate leg of the Seeders Cup as no trifectas were registered.

Heading into the final leg, Little Tuna (11 points) maintains a five point lead over Kal Krome (6 points). The Bookie (5 points) remains in third place.

The Strategist (3 points) and Wise Orangutan (2 points) have an outside chance to overtake the leaders.

Minds Blank, Big Tuna, and B-Reezy (0 points) will need to focus on the few teams still in contention for the top seeds in the playoffs.

Trifecta Points

Standings | Seeders' Cup II | Leg 3
Standings after Leg 3 of the 2015-16 Seeders’ Cup

Tiebreakers

Tiebreakers | Seeders' Cup II | Leg 3
Tiebreakers after Leg 3 of the 2015-16 Seeders’ Cup

Share This: